<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ThePanda - Latest Comments in Type Kung-Fu</title><link>http://thepanda.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://thepanda.disqus.com/type_kung_fu/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:49:15 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Type Kung-Fu</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/02/type-kung-fu.html#comment-32521971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In general, type safety would be much appreciated, see piece of code below, it would never have compiled in Ocaml, and would not have taken me and a friend seven and a half hours to hunt down, and hence would not have kept us up all night (it really did, I went to sleep at noon yesterday)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cigarette Electronique</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:49:15 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>