<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ThePanda - Latest Comments in To Those Who Didn&amp;#8217;t Follow the Link</title><link>http://thepanda.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://thepanda.disqus.com/to_those_who_didn8217t_follow_the_link/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:49:04 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: To Those Who Didn&amp;#8217;t Follow the Link</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/02/to-those-who-didnt-follow-the-link.html#comment-32521952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Scientific American also claims that it won’t be breaking any encryption schemes, making this entirely worthless. Also the guy in the Scientific American article seems to accept the fact that it probably won’t be viable at larger scales, and might not scale up, and might not be the commercial success everyone wants it to be.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cigarette Electronique</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 14:49:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>