<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>ThePanda - Latest Comments in Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:08:49 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-21654838</link><description>since while I know what both involve to a first approximation, not writing any large chunk of code in either implies not being used to the idiosyncrasies of either, and not being able to parse the language well in one's head (it took me a 40 minute train ride home to figure out to a first approximation what some of the code in here means).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">soifos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 05:08:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-20790732</link><description>I have been failing miserably, since while I know what both involve to a first approximation, not writing any large chunk of code in either implies not being used to the idiosyncrasies of either, and not being able to parse the language well in one's head (it took me a 40 minute train ride home to figure out to a first approximation what some of the code in here means).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks and Regards</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KASJDKAL</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:01:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-20779837</link><description>So I am going to try learning parser combinators in one of the languages (possibly Scala since it would gel with something I am doing with Itay), and then eventually convert what I learn in one into the other, and hope that works. Either ways from what little I read of parser combinators they seem like an interesting model for parsers, at least the scala implementation seems to be fairly nifty in terms of being literally readable as a grammar.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">akdhjasdh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:33:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-20055492</link><description>You can't go wrong with Haskell as a parser</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anne of Green Gables DVD</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:32:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-19508466</link><description>Very interesting idea thanks for sharing it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dainanic</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 06:45:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-17555189</link><description>Nice article Thanks. I'm wondering if Scalas/Haskells parser combinators are sufficient for parsing a programming language. More specifically the language MiniJava. I'm currently reading compiller construction and jflex and java cup is quite painful to work with so I'm wondering if I could/should use parser combinators instead. The MiniJava syntax is very small.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Best Regards</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stop_snoring</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:52:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-16866671</link><description>You really had great insights, thanks a lot for sharing it with us, KUDOS on you!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rozeme3</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:41:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-16801726</link><description>It's not easy grasping Scala and Haskell.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shopfittings</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:26:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-16628023</link><description>Parsel combinations and Scala is really at the forefront in 2007.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">stroketreatment</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-16615088</link><description>So I am going to try learning parser combinators in one of the languages (possibly Scala since it would gel with something I am doing with Itay), and then eventually convert what I learn in one into the other, and hope that works. Either ways from what little I read of parser combinators they seem like an interesting model for parsers, at least the scala implementation seems to be fairly nifty in terms of being literally readable as a grammar.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks and Regards</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">aidasljkh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-15302675</link><description>I have been trying to get a better grasp of both languages for a while, and though I have been doing this for widely divergent reasons (Haskell - strong links to math, the cool factor, reading a decent paper on monads on the recommendation of a couple of people, and not knowing how to use it, Scala - lots of chatter about it coming my way from Itay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks and Regards</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">khadjhiowen</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 06:29:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Parser Combinators, Scala, Haskell</title><link>http://thepanda.org/2007/08/parser-combinators-scala-haskell.html#comment-15238525</link><description>I surely what both involve to a first approximation, not writing any large chunk of code in either implies not being used to the idiosyncrasies of either, and not being able to parse the language well in one's head it took me a 40 minute train ride home to figure out to a first approximation what some of the code in here means for now:)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks and Regards</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cfasdakj</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:22:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>